张赤东,宋大伟,潘教峰.基于智库双螺旋法的区域创新环境评价研究[J].中国科学院院刊,2022,37(6):745-755.

基于智库双螺旋法的区域创新环境评价研究

Evaluation of Regional Innovation Environment Based on Think Tank Double Helix Methodology
作者
张赤东1,2*
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190;中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049
ZHANG Chidong1,2*
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
宋大伟1
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190
SONG Dawei1
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
潘教峰1,2
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190;中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049
PAN Jiaofeng1,2
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
中文关键词
         智库双螺旋法;区域创新环境评价;过程融合法;逻辑层次法
英文关键词
        think tank double helix methodology;evaluation of regional innovation environment;data-information-intelligence-solution (DIIS);mechanism-impact-policy-solution (MIPS)
中文摘要
        基于智库双螺旋法研究新时期我国区域创新环境评价。以DIIS过程融合法归纳国内外经验,逐层分析评价对象层次性、理论演进动态性和指标框架结构性特征,揭示区域创新环境评价作为政策工具的本质属性。以MIPS逻辑层次法研究区域创新环境评价指标体系,以过去案例阐释评价机理,以当前案例分析影响机制,并提出面向未来发展的评价要突出政策作用机制,科学地处理创新阶段性与评价工具性之间的关系。以DIIS与MIPS矩阵式交叉融合方法,研究提出完善区域创新环境评价方案的系统化路径,创造性提出评价指标的“四维分析方法”,从而展示出一个思路清晰、逻辑严谨、导向明确的智库研究新范式。
英文摘要
        The evaluation of regional innovation environment (RIE) is an important policy tool to strengthen the construction of regional innovation system (RIS). At present, the research is academic rather than decision-making, and lacks the guidance of research methods of think tanks based on the complex social system. Based on the think tank double helix methodology raised by Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASISD), this work carries out a systematic and in-depth study on the evaluation of China's RIE and its index system in the new era on the basis of objective and scientific evaluation of relevant research and practice. Firstly, taking the data-informationintelligence-solution (DIIS) method as a main approach to in-depth summarize the evaluation of RIE, and analyze the grasp of the hierarchy of evaluation objects, the evolution dynamics of evaluation theory, and the structure of evaluation index framework in the existing research layer by layer from phenomenon to essence, so as to reveal the essential attribute of the evaluation of RIE as a policy tool, and explore the function of the evaluation as a means to guide the social cognition and development trend. Secondly, taking the mechanism-impact-policy-solution (MIPS) as the main method and taking steps from the past to the future, to discuss the scientization of the analysis idea of the evaluation index system of RIE, explain the evaluation mechanism through past cases, and the decisive role of the basic mechanism of regional innovation environment development on the construction of the evaluation index system, as well as the differences and commonality of the evaluation indexes in different regions; then, through the current case analysis of the impact mechanism, this study expounds the impact of different policy positioning, research methods, and regional factors on the evaluation index system and its effect; furthermore, it is proposed that the evaluation facing the future development should highlight the policy action mechanism and scientifically deal with the relationship between innovating stages and the instrumentality of evaluation. Finally, by using the think tank double helix methodology, a matrix cross fusion of DIIS and MIPS, this work studies and puts forward a systematic solution to improve the evaluation index system of RIE from process to result. The main conclusions are as follows. Firstly, a new analysis method for systematic analysis of evaluation indicators is summarized by using the think tank double helix methodology, which is called the "four-dimensional analysis method". Secondly, the think tank double helix methodology adheres to the "Three Orientations", which makes it easier to find and overcome the disadvantages of the single, empirical, scattered, academic, and static method of "from index to index" in the previous research. Thirdly, the think tank double helix methodology derives a systematic solution that is both theoretical and practical, and constructs the general requirements, basic principles, main characteristics, evaluation methods, and objectives of the organizational implementation stage of the regional innovation environment evaluation index system that is more suitable for China's developing stage now, in line with the direction of innovation strategy and policy needs. The study shows that the think tank double helix methodology do adhere to the systematic scientific method and provide a new paradigm of the research of think tanks on complex social systemic issues with clear thinking, rigorous logic, and clear guidance.
DOI10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20220406004
作者简介
张赤东中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院创新发展政策研究所副所长、研究员,中国科学院中国创新战略和政策研究中心科技体制组组长。研究方向:企业创新与政策、国家创新体系与科技体制改革、创新评价与创新管理。中国科学学与科技政策研究会理事(技术创新专业委员会副秘书长)、中国发展战略学研究会常务理事(创新战略专业委员会副主任)、中国汽车企业创新评价首席专家。至今承担课题 60余项,其中主持国家级、省部级课题 20余项,主持完成企业委托课题近 10项,参与国家技术创新中心、联盟、创新联合体等多项政策的制定研究与评估工作。发表文章 60余篇,在《瞭望》《光明日报》《新华文摘》等发表/被转载多篇文章,出版论著近 30本。
E-mail:zhangchidong@casisd.cn
ZHANG Chidong Ph.D. in Management, Professor of Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Deputy Director of the Innovation and Development Policy Research Institute, Head of the S&T System Research Section in China Innovation Strategy and Policy Research Center, CAS; also Director of the Chinese Association of Science of Sciences and S&T Policy Research (Deputy Secretary General of the Special Committee on Technology Innovation), Member of China EV100 and Executive Director of Research Association of China's Science of Development Strategy (Vice Chairman of Special Committee on Innovation Strategy). His research focuses on enterprise innovation and its policy, national innovation system and S&T system reform, innovation evaluation and innovation management, etc. In recent years, he has undertaken more than 60 projects, including in charge of more than 20 national, provincial, and ministerial projects and nearly 10 enterprise entrusted projects, and participated in the drafting, formulation, and evaluation of a multitude of national S&T policies on enterprise innovation, alliances, consortia, etc. More than 60 articles have been published, including 37 in core journals (first authored and corresponding authored 20 of them), many articles have been published or reprinted in Outlook, Guangming Daily, Economic Daily, Learning Times, Science and Technology Daily and Xinhua Digest, and nearly 30 treatises have been published. In November 2017, he won the first Outstanding Youth Award of the Chinese Association of Science of Sciences and S&T Policy Research.
E-mail:zhangchidong@casisd.cn
微信关注公众号