潘教峰,张凤,鲁晓.促进智库研究的“六个转变”[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36(10):1226-1234.

促进智库研究的“六个转变”

Promoting “Six Transitions” in Think Tank Research
作者
潘教峰1,2
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190;中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049
PAN Jiaofeng1,2
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
张凤1,2
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190;中国科学院大学 公共政策与管理学院 北京 100049
ZHANG Feng1,2
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
鲁晓1*
中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院 北京 100190
LU Xiao1*
Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
中文关键词
         智库研究;智库双螺旋法;"六个转变"
英文关键词
        think tank research;think tank double helix methodology;six transitions
中文摘要
        文章分析国内外智库研究的现状和特点,提出在中国特色新型智库建设迈向高质量发展新阶段的时代背景下,智库研究需要实现“六个转变”——从经验式向科学化转变,从零散式向系统性转变,从随机式向规范性转变,从偏学术型向学术实践型转变,从静态向稳态转变,从学科单一向融合贯通转变。文章深入阐释了如何以智库双螺旋法为基本理论方法范式,促进智库研究实现“六个转变”,并进一步揭示了智库双螺旋法在推动智库研究科学化发展上的价值意义。
英文摘要
        The article analyzed the current characteristics and situation of think tank research both domestically and internationally, and raised the ideas that think tank research need to achieve "six transitions" especially under the background of think tank construction agenda of Chinese government, which is to transition from empirical to scientific research, from discrete to systematic approach, from randomness to normativeness, from pure academic-oriented to integrative studies fitting both academic and practical requirements, from static to stable style, and from a single discipline basis to comprehensive and consistent research. Based on long-term experiences and practices in policy and strategic research, Prof. PAN Jiaofeng at the Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASISD) proposed a new method for think tank research, namely the think tank double helix methodology. The methodology comprises of two cycles:the external cycle featuring three stages-the deduction of research question, the comprehensive research, and the regression to the real problem, and the internal iterative cycle involving two mutually embedded helixes-DIIS at the process level and MIPS at the inherent logic level. The DIIS helix emphasizes that the research must follow a step-wise process beginning at data (D) collection, and proceeding to information (I) revelation, intelligence (I) synthesis, and arriving at solution (S) formation; while MIPS helix stresses that the content of the research must follow a logical pathway starting from mechanism (M) analysis, developing to impact (I) analysis and policy (P) analysis, and finally arriving at solution (S) formation. In the booming field of think tank research, the double helix methodology represents a fundamental work to advance the scientific development of think tank research, given that it provides a pathway to promote the "six transitions" as mentioned above and to establish think tank research as a science. The methodology would provide think tank research with a new way of thinking, practice guidelines, and operational approach, hence establishing a research paradigm for think tank research. As a new way of thinking, it aims at eliminating the scattered, fragmented and simplified style of thinking, giving way to a more holistic and systematic mindset. As a practice guideline, it offers a global, panoramic and full-process reference for think tank research, covering both the process and the content of the research. As an operational approach, it plays an instrumental role in gathering the wisdom of experts and scholars with various academic backgrounds and experiences, and comprehensively integrating methods and tools of different types. Therefore, this article explains in detail about how to utilize the think tank double helix methodology as the basic theoretical and methodological paradigm, so as to promote the "six transitions", and reveals the value and significance of the think tank double helix methodology in promoting the scientific development of think tank research.
DOI10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20211007001
作者简介
潘教峰 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院院长、研究员、博士生导师,国务院研究室-中国科学院共建的中国创新战略和政策研究中心共同主任。中国发展战略学研究会理事长,中国科学技术法学会副会长,中国科技评估与成果管理研究会副理事长,全国科技评估标准化技术委员会副主任委员。全国政协参政议政人才库特聘专家。国家"有突出贡献中青年专家"。主要从事科技战略规划、创新政策和智库理论方法研究。原创性提出智库研究基本逻辑体系和双螺旋法。主持过 60余项国家级决策咨询、规划、政策和战略研究课题,取得了一批有影响的重大决策咨询成果和理论成果。主笔的研究报告、政策建议和学术文章 200余篇,合著和主编专著 10余部。
E-mail:jfpan@casisd.cn
PAN Jiaofeng Professor, Doctorial Supervisor, President of the Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASISD), Co-director of China Innovation Strategy and Policy Research Center funded by Research Office of the State Council and CAS, Chairman of the Chinese Association of Development Strategy Studies, Vice President of China Law Association on Science and Technology, Vice Chairman of China Association of Scientific and Technological Achievements Management, Vice Chair of National Technical Committee on Science and Technology Evaluation of Standardization Administration of China. He is one of the speciallyappointed experts of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference. He was awarded the honorary title of "Young and Middleaged Experts with Outstanding Contributions". His research focuses on S&T strategic planning, innovation policy, think-tank theory and method research. He originally proposes the Basic Logical System of Think Tank Research, and Double Helix Methodology of Think Tank Research. He has presided more than 60 major decision-making advising research projects, and has achieved a batch of influential outcomes in terms of major decision making consultations and research theory. Leading authored research reports and policy recommendations, and published academic articles have been accumulated to more than 200, as well as more than 10 coauthored or chief edited monographs.
E-mail:jfpan@casisd.cn
鲁晓 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院研究员,中国科学院学部科学规范与伦理研究支撑中心执行副主任。研究方向为社会网络、组织社会学、科学社会学、科学规范与科技伦理、智库理论与方法。研究成果发表于 Research Policy、Science、Technology and Society、EASTS,《科学学研究》等国内外期刊。
E-mail:luxiao@casisd.cn
LU Xiao Ph.D. Professor of the Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Executive Deputy Director of the Research Center of Scientific Norms and Ethics of Academic Divisions of CAS. Her research interests were around social network and organizational studies, sociology of science, science and technology ethics, think tank methodology. She has published a couple of articles in core journals at home and abroad, including Research Policy, Science, Technology and Society, EASTS, Studies in Science of Science, etc.
E-mail:luxiao@casisd.cn
微信关注公众号