把握科技创新与产业创新融合发展逻辑 培育发展新质生产力

Integrating scientific and technological innovation with industrial innovation: Understanding strategic logic of deep integration to foster new quality productive forces in China’s new development stage

        中国科学院科技创新发展中心(中国科学院科技创新发展中心 北京 100190)

         科技创新;产业创新;融合;新质生产力;“双螺旋结构”

        scientific and technological innovation;industrial innovation;integration;new quality productive forces;“dual helix structure”

        科技创新和产业创新，是发展新质生产力的基本路径。这一科学论断，是习近平总书记立足新时代中国发展，准确把握全球创新发展的历史逻辑、理论逻辑与实践逻辑所作出的重大判断，深刻揭示了现代生产力跃升的根本路径和中国式现代化的战略支点，是新时代发展新质生产力理论的重大创新，具有开创性、引领性、时代性意义，为推进高质量发展和中国式现代化提供了科学指引和根本遵循。文章从科技创新与产业创新融合发展的历史逻辑、理论逻辑、实践逻辑等出发，提出科技创新与产业创新融合发展的“双螺旋结构”，指出融合过程中存在结构性张力，亟须科学处理前瞻性与实践性、战略性与市场性、公共性与独占性、全局性与局部性、协同性与竞争性5对关键关系，从加强源头融合、过程融合、资源融合、价值融合、能力融合、区域融合等方面提出了政策建议。

        The deep integration of scientific and technological innovation with industrial innovation serves as the core mechanism for cultivating new quality productive forces. President Xi Jinping advances this scientific proposition based on China’s development practice in the new era and the historical, theoretical, and practical logic of global innovation advancement. The proposition profoundly elucidates the fundamental mechanisms driving contemporary productivity leaps and the strategic pivot for Chinese path to modernization. As a major theoretical innovation, this theory is groundbreaking, exemplary, and contemporary, providing a scientific foundation and strategic guidance for high-quality development and Chinese path to modernization. This study examines the integrated development of technological and industrial innovation through a tripartite analytical framework encompassing historical, theoretical, and practical logic. It identifies structural tensions inherent in the “dual-helix” integration model and proposes a systematic approach to scientifically manage five critical dialectical relationships: forward-looking vision versus practical implementation, market orientation versus strategic imperatives, public welfare versus proprietary interests, local optimization versus global coordination, and competitive dynamics versus collaborative synergies. Building upon this analytical foundation, the study advances policy pathways for deep integration: convergence at the source level, process integration, resource consolidation, value alignment, capability synergy, and regional coordination.