一流智库战略研究成果的质量管理机制

On Quality Management of Think Tanks' Strategic Research Output

        张志强(中国科学院成都文献情报中心 成都 610041)
        苏娜(中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院(筹) 北京 100190)

         智库;战略与政策研究机构;高质量研究与分析标准;评审指南;同行专家评审;质量管理机制

        think tank;strategy and policy research institute;high quality standard for research and analysis;guidelines for review;peer review;quality management mechanism

        国际一流智库影响力的取得有很多决定因素，但关键是其战略研究与政策咨询报告的高质量，而高质量又取决于其研究成果的高标准与质量管理机制。文章通过对一些国际一流智库高质量研究标准或指南、研究成果的严格独立同行评审的质量管理机制和流程的梳理，总结了研究成果质量管理机制的有益经验和启示。文章指出，我国新型智库建设中，尚未将高质量分析与研究的质量管理机制作为智库建设的重要环节来抓，既缺乏研究成果的相关高质量管理理念，也缺乏管理的制度规范，更缺乏质量管理控制的严格流程。为此，文章提出了我国新型智库建设的高质量分析与研究标准及质量管理机制建议。

        Among the factors that determine the influence of think tank's decision-making consultations, the high quality research and analysis of strategies and policies is the key one, which further depends on its high quality standards and quality management system. This article introduces the high quality standards or guidelines for research and analysis of strategies and policies of the world's leading think tanks and institutes dedicated to strategic and policy research, as well as the peer review system and process for strategic research output, from which valuable experiences and enlightenments for quality management of strategic research output are summarized. This article concludes that China's decision-making consultancies, even the new-type think tanks have not treat the quality management system as the core of think tank construction and development, not only lacking idea of quality management, but also the basic institutions and the process of quality management and control. In the context of China's new-type think tank construction and development, suggestions for high-quality standards of research and analysis of strategies and policies are put forwards at last.